An integrated social group is one in which there is a great deal of social interaction within the group and people are bound together by such organizational bonds as common goals and purposes. A good team and a good school as miniature societies illustrate integrated social groups.
The quantity and quality of friendships developed by students in a physical education class or on an athletic squad should be a concern of a good teacher.
They are also personal concerns of students. In a well-integrated social group each individual would tend to accept every other individual in the group at a close personal distance.
Trapp revealed in his study the evidence of social integration possible in a college football squad. The process of social integration in the team, as a whole, was positive and continuous throughout the season. There was an increase of social acceptance of the freshman by the seniors.
There was a positive and continuous process of social integration between the members of the freshman class. The only subgroups showing an increase in social distance between them were the fraternity members and the independents within the squad.
As the season progressed, a decrease in social distance between the linemen was apparent. The backfield men were drawn closer to the lineman in personal distance as the process of social integration proceeded. Pubic used 326 freshmen and sophomore women in physical education classes in her study.
She reported that by placing emphasis on students becoming acquainted with each other as soon as possible, the volume of social interaction over a period of six weeks almost doubled in all cases, regardless of the type of activity.
Gustad in summarizing the research literature dealing with factors associated with social adjustment and maladjustment noted that those participating in social activities tended to have fewer significant scores on adjustment inventories and to exhibit less maladjustment.
They were generally more extroverted, stable, and dominant than non-participants. Participation in extracurricular activities was associated, also, with above average academic also to be brighter than the average student. There was no evidence that a reasonable amount of extracurricular activity affected grades.
Erwee found a positive statistical relationship between employee participation in the sports activities of a large industrial plant and the merit ratings of supervisors. The merit ratings were based on aspects of dependability, accuracy, efficiency, safety, and social adjustment.
Cowell found that some of the outstanding social traits which homeroom teachers, physical-education teachers, and special observers ascribed to actives and which differentiated between junior high school boys who participated wholeheartedly in the activities of the physical education program and those who did not were "unembarrassed and at home in a crowd," "talkative and active," "gave considerable leadership to the group," "a good mixer," "seems to like and seek social contacts," and other social behaviours indicative of satisfactory adjustment.
It is concluded that students who were well adjusted as measured by the Neurotic Tendency Scale of the Bernreuter Personality Inventory tended to participate in more recreational sports activities and had more hobbies than their fellow students who indicated neurotic tendencies. These relationships were somewhat closer for men than for women.
Walters presented an analysis of the change in social adjustment of motivated and non-motivated groups in a seven-week bowling class.
The results seem to indicate that though both groups became more socially adjusted as a result of group participation and acquaintance, the motivated group became better adjusted than the non- motivated. The good bowlers seemed to be better accepted socially.
Andersen, Heine. 1988. Rationalitet, velfærd, og retfærdighed (Rationality, Welfare, and Justice). Copenhagen: Nyt Nordisk Forlag Arnold Busck.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1964. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press. (Orig. edn. 1893).Google Scholar
Gerth, H.H. and C. Wright Mills (eds). 1958. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Galaxy Book.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1971. Relations in Public. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1973. Legitimationsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. One. Boston: Beacon Press (Orig. edn. 1981).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. Two. Cambridge: Polity Press (Orig. edn. 1981).Google Scholar
Hebdige, Dick. 1979. Subculture — the Meaning of Style. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
Kneer, George and Armin Nassehi. 1993. Niklas Luhmanns Theorie sozialer Systeme. Eine Einführung. Munich: Wilhelm Frank Verlag.Google Scholar
Lockwood, David. 1964. ‘Social Integration and System Integration’ in G.K. Zollschan and W. Hirsch (eds), Explorations in Social Change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lockwood, David. 1992. Solidarity and Schisms, ‘The Problem of Disorder’ in Durkheimian and Marxist Sociology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1982. The Differentiation of Society. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mortensen, Nils. 1991. Modsætninger og forsoninger mellem strukturer og aktører (Oppositions and reconciliations between structures and actors). Politica, 23, 42–59.Google Scholar
Mouzelis, Nicos. 1991. Back to Sociological Theory. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1951. The Social System. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Ritzer, George. 1992. Sociological Theory. Third edition. New York. McGraw-Hill, Inc.Google Scholar
Schutz, Alfred. 1975. Hverdagslivets sociologi (The Sociology of Everyday Life). Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. 1961. ‘The Nature of Society’, in Talcott Parsons et al. (eds) Theories of Society, 1. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Thyssen, Ole. 1991. Penge, magt og kærlighed. Teorien om symbolsk generaliserede medier hos Parsons, Luhmann og Habermas. (Money, Power and Lore. The Theory of Symbolically Generalized Media in Parsons, Luhmann and Habermas). Copenhagen: Rosinante.Google Scholar
Tônnies, Ferdinand. 1963. Community and Society (Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft). New York: Harper (Orig. edn. 1887).Google Scholar