Essays Motivator Factors In The Two

Introduction

This paper begins by presenting four theories of motivation; Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, Herzberg's Two-Factor theory, Adams' Equity theory and the Goal Setting theory. Each theory is briefly explained and applied to the Starbucks case after which a critique is given. A section at the end provides recommendations for job enrichment and also relational job design as methods management at Starbucks can employ to maintain an efficient and productive workforce.

Maslow's Needs Theory

This theory states that humans are motivated by needs which are in hierarchical order from basic to higher order needs; humans address these sequentially starting with physiological, security, affiliation, esteem and topmost self-actualisation (Rollinson 2008). Maslow states that when needs are satisfied they cease to have a motivational effect on an individual (Robbins et al 2014). One view for Starbucks management would be to infer using Maslow's theory that the job at this point has satisfied the employees' lower level needs, as such there is a need to consider a new set of motivators related to Maslow's affiliation and esteem needs. This could include making employees feel like a family at Starbucks, shareholding and availing clear promotion opportunities. However French et al (2011:163) state that, "a person's frame of reference will determine the order of importance of their needs and societal culture influences that frame of reference." Thus French et al (2011) contest the universal application of Maslow's needs hierarchy and argue that employees from different ethnicities and cultures are not motivated by the same needs. Rollinson (2008) gives credit to Maslow nevertheless by stating that perhaps this theory's main contribution is providing a general framework for categorising needs of different types.

Herzberg's Two-factor Theory

Herzberg proposes two factors in his theory, hygiene factors and motivating factors. According to Herzberg the absence of hygiene factors, which include pay, job security, working conditions and interpersonal relations among others, would lead to dissatisfaction and their presence does not lead to motivation. Herzberg's motivators include recognition, responsibility and nature of work among others, their presence would motivate but there absence leads to a neutral state of neither satisfaction or dissatisfaction (King and Lawley, 2013). According to Herzberg's theory, the nature of work, like being repetitive, cannot lead to demotivation or dissatisfaction. To employ this theory in the Starbucks workplace Herzberg proposes a two-stage approach (Griffin and Moorhead, 2011) as follows: First, management should achieve a state of no dissatisfaction by addressing Herzberg's hygiene factors, this can include among others giving an industry matching pay, improving working conditions and fostering interpersonal relations at work. Second, once a state of dissatisfaction exists by adequately addressing the hygiene factors, employee motivation can then be achieved by introducing the motivators like more opportunities for advancement, and redesigning the job to take on more tasks and responsibilities. In the Starbucks case therefore, assuming all hygiene factors are in place, management needs to consider motivators like clear opportunities for achievement, personal growth and promotion. They also need to consider the nature of the work and redesign the job to include more task variety and responsibility, factors that Herzberg argued motivate employees and lead to satisfaction (Griffin and Moorhead, 2011). Perhaps the main strength of this theory is that Herzberg provided a clear way of how managers can apply it in practice using the two-stage approach above and job enrichment (Griffin and Moorhead, 2011). Rollinson (2008), states that to test validity of this theory, it has been replicated many times and results have generally supported Herzberg's theory though not entirely. The main area of criticism is that classifying the work features into hygiene factors and motivators can be problematic as it was noted that both factors could lead to feelings of satisfaction and dissatisfaction differing from person to person (Rollinson, 2008). People differ and Herzberg's one size fits all classification does not stand in real life tests (Rollinson, 2008). Modern society is multicultural and so is Starbucks as an employer (Starbucks, 2015 and also Adler and Gundersen, 2008). Applicability of Herzberg's theory across different cultures differs, and so can be its applicability to people from different cultures yet within the same organisation (Adler and Gundersen, 2008; Rollinson 2008 and also Gambrel and Cianci 2003). Therefore, in this regard, due diligence needs to be taken as to how this theory can be applied to people from different cultures. While Herzberg's theory discounts the possibility of Starbucks staff being demotivated by repetitive tasks, the finding of the Starbucks manager might be accurate and for this reason other theories of motivation need to be considered for a solution to this problem.

Equity Theory

The psychologist Stacy Adams postulated that the primary motivating force for employees is striving for equity or fairness. The theory's starting point is an exchange where an employee gives something, like skills and labour (inputs) and gets something for it like pay and recognition (outputs). The pivotal point of the theory being a reference person or group which the person uses to evaluate one's own inputs/outputs balance (Miner, 2005). Inequity or dissatisfaction sets in where one notes a disparity with their reference other. Informing the Starbucks manager from Adams' standpoint calls for a review of dissatisfied employees' job specification and also the jobs of those these employees can use as referent others. Further Starbucks job designs need to be benchmarked alongside competitors' like Costa coffee. To maintain an efficient and productive workforce as informed by the equity theory requires Starbucks management to offer the best remuneration package compared to the industry average. Another key factor to be considered when employing this theory is for management to make the employees aware of the basis on which the remuneration package is structured. This will help inform the employees when they make comparison as they understand the basis of their input/output balance. Adams theory is highly regarded for its simplicity and standing up to the rigours of empirical tests, Rollinson (2008) states that tests have generally supported Adams' propositions in the Equity theory and its predictions. However, Miner (2005) notes that in field tests of this theory some economically deprived individuals were very productive despite inequity. A conclusion drawn was that economic motivation was greater than equity motivation in the case. This shows that the equity theory can be a limited theory which only centres on one type of motivation. Further the comparison to referent others is subjective, conclusions of equity or inequity are subjective as well, so is the choice of the referent other one uses for comparison (Milner 2005). These drawbacks should be noted by Starbucks management in applying this theory.

Goal Setting Theory

Rauch (2006) explains Locke's goal setting theory as a proven theory in its assertion that specific and challenging goals improve work performance. Rollinson (2008) further explains that this goal directed effort is a function of goal acceptance and goal commitment which lead to what Locke terms Performance, aided by organisational support and the individual's abilities. The goal setting theory states that where one's performance leads to goal achievement, equitable rewards both intrinsic and extrinsic are expected and the rewards determine the level of the person's eventual satisfaction (Rauch 2006). Using the goal setting theory would require the Starbucks management to make specific individual goals with their disaffected workforce with rewards attached to goal attainment. However, as Landy and Conte (2010) point out modern workplaces are usually organised to work in teams and this theory does not adequately address goal setting in team based workplaces. Another shortcoming of the Goal Setting theory is its appeal to drive employees to unethical practices so that they can appear to be achieving their goals (Landy and Conte 2010) Notwithstanding, Harris and Hartman (2002) point out that research into this theory generally support its assertions. Joint goal setting has indeed been shown to have a positive impact on employee performance in most cases (Harris and Hartman 2002). In the same vein, research also corroborates Locke's assertion that specific goals with a reasonable level of difficulty often lead to higher employee performance (Harris and Hartman 2002).Recommendations on how the manager can maintain an efficient and productive workforce within the organisation. Rollinson (2008:240) states that, "to address low motivation, the most common approach for the last decades has been through job-redesign" This section will dissect the possibility of employing this tool in the Starbucks scenario.

Job Re-Design

In the Starbucks case, a job re-design is one of the tools the management can employ to make the job more rewarding both intrinsically and extrinsically. Following on from the discussed theories, Herzberg's theory perhaps provides the most substantial content to inform job re-design as a motivational tool for the Starbucks management (Herzberg, 2003). Herzberg states that a job needs to be designed so that the Two Factor theory's motivators are built into the job (Herzberg, 2003). This process is commonly termed job enrichment (Rollinson, 2008). This encompasses horizontal job enlargement (more tasks) and vertical job enlargement (more responsibility). Thus the Starbucks staff can have a role that stretches from receiving the inputs, informing on re-order levels, serving customers and being responsible for customer satisfaction for instance. Rollinson (2008) argues that this gives employees a feeling that that their job is meaningful and increases intrinsic motivation and satisfaction. Notwithstanding the appeal of job enrichment, both Grant (2007) and Rollinson (2008) allude to the fact that results of all tests to this theory are mixed and one cannot make a clear conclusion. The main criticism remains that Job enrichment is built upon Herzberg's two factor theory and individuals respond differently to an enriched job and not in a standard universal fashion as posited by the Two Factor theory and job enrichment. Not everyone wants an enriched job, some people prefer boring jobs as they pursue other meaningful activities outside work to cater for their needs (Rollinson 2008).

Relational Job Design for a Prosocial Difference

It can be argued that a frontline retail job at Starbucks lacks variety by its nature. Attempts to re-design it and enlarge it horizontally or vertically can be limited and fail due to simply being not much else that can be added to the required tasks. In this respect a different perspective to motivation may be required to maintain an efficient and productive workforce. Grant (2007) puts forward the notion of relational job design. Grant, (2007:393) puts this notion across as follows, "......existing research focuses on individual differences and the task structures of jobs ..... Relational architecture of jobs shapes the motivation to make a prosocial difference". Grant (2007) advocates connecting employees to the impact they are having on the recipient of their efforts. The recipients can both be internal, like co-workers and management, or external such as customers. Grant (2007) points out that where individuals realise the difference their efforts are making in others' lives they are motivated and perform better. Thus in Starbucks for instance, employees can be connected to coffee bean producers in developing countries who supply Starbucks coffee beans, and understand for themselves how their efforts are changing lives abroad. They can also be connected to the lonely people who sit and sip coffee in Starbucks and make relationships. Further, employees can be made a part of the corporate social responsibility programmes of the firm so that they can relate their efforts with its positive societal impact.

Conclusion

Several theories of motivation have been analysed in this paper and employed to inform management at Starbucks on how they can maintain an efficient and productive workforce. Maslow's Hierarchy of needs provide a useful framework for categorising needs of different types however its one-size fits all approach to motivation is questioned by scholars and practitioners alike and research has not fully corroborated its assertions. The Two Factor theory has more appeal in the workplace due to the fact that Herzberg provided a clear way of how managers can employ it in practice. Research has also supported the theory somewhat. However it has been noted that what Herzberg classified as hygiene factors have worked as motivators to other people and vice versa. Therefore like Maslow's theory, Herzberg's theory has the problem of purporting to offer a universal application, which research disputes as inaccurate. Joint goal setting has been supported by research and shown to positively impact on employee performance, however some academics point to the fact that the theory is getting obsolete as modern workplaces are organised into teams which are not addressed by the Goal setting theory. The Equity theory informs management to consider fairness in both job design and remuneration. So that informal comparisons in the workplace do not lead to dissatisfaction. The theory is readily accepted for its simplicity and has held to its assertions in research. However it tends only to consider a single type of motivation-equity, at the expense of other motivation types like economic motivation which has been shown to be stronger than equity in some cases. Tools put forward in this paper for maintaining a productive and efficient workforce are job enrichment and relational job redesign which takes focus off the tasks and connects employee with the impact of their work in the community for which Grant (2007) argues that people are motivated when they realise how their efforts are helping others.

References

Adler N. J and Gundersen A (2008). International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior. 5th ed. Mason: Thomson Learning. French R, Rayner C, Rees G, and Rumbles S (2011). Organisational Behaviour. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons Ltd. Gambrel P. A and Cianci R (2003). Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs: Does it Apply in a Collectivisit Culture. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship. 8 (2), p143- 161. Grant A. M (2007). Relational Job Design and The Motivation to Make a Prosocial Difference. Academy of Management Review. 32 (2), p393-417. Griffin R.W and Moorhead G (2011). Organizational Behaviour. Managing People and Organizations. 10th ed. Mason: Cengage learning. Harris O.J and Hartman S. J (2002). Organisational Behaviour. New York: Best Business Books Herzberg F (2003). One More Time: How Do You Motivate Employees. Harvard Business Review. 1 (1), p3-11. King D and Lawley S (2013). Organizational Behaviour. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Landy F. J and Conte J.M (2010). Work in the 21st Century: An Introduction to Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 3rd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons Inc. Miner J. B (2005). Organizational Behavior: Essential theories of motivation and leadership. New York: M.E. Sharpe Inc Rauch C (2006). The Goal-Setting Theory. Norderstedt: Druck un Bindung Robbins S, Judge T. A, Millett B, and Boyle M (2014). Organisational Behaviour. 7th ed. Frenchs Forrest: Pearson Australia. Rollinson D (2008). Organisational Behaviour and Analysis. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited Starbucks. (2015). Working at Starbucks. Available: http://www.starbucks.co.uk/careers/working-at-starbucks

Motivators And Hygiene Essay

Maslow introduced theory on job satisfaction and motivation. In previous education classes at Benedictine University Maslow was studied in detail as the cornerstone of motivating high school children. His theory is based on a hierarchy of five needs, physiological, safety, social, achievement/esteem, and self-actualization. Individual needs are met by the importance attached to the various needs and the amount of importance the person attaches to it.
I believe any discussion on motivation should begin with Herzberg’s dual factor theory of job satisfaction. Herzberg takes Maslow’s theory one-step farther. According to Herzberg, people are influenced by two sets of factors, Motivators and Hygiene. The Hygiene factors include things like pay and benefits, company policy, security, working conditions, supervision, status and relationships. The Motivating factors include achievement, recognition, responsibility, growth and the work itself. Hygiene factors are associated with X type leadership while Motivating factors are viewed as Y type leadership.
Hygiene factors are not the source of satisfaction, but these issues must be dealt with first in order to create an environment in which personal satisfaction and motivation is possible. Hygiene factors can prevent dissatisfaction but if improperly used, they can result in negative feelings. They are factors that describe the conditions of work rather than the work itself. In short, People are made dissatisfied by a bad environment, but a good one rarely satisfies them. On the other hand, prevention of dissatisfaction is just as important as encouragement of motivator satisfaction. Herzberg says that if you want to motivate people, you have to be concerned with the job itself and not simply with the hygiene factors. Motivators are things that allow for personal growth and development on the job. They are closely related to self-actualization, involving a challenge, an opportunity to grow, achieve a sense of accomplishment, and to be recognized.
Hygiene factors operate independently of motivation factors. An individual can be highly motivated in his work and be dissatisfied with his environment. Hygiene improvements only have short-term effects. Any improvements result in a short-term prevention of, dissatisfaction. Hygiene needs are cyclical in nature and come back to a starting point.
According to Path Goal, theory of leadership the leader’s job is to guide workers toward the best path to reach their goal in conjunction with the organizations goals as well that in turn leads to increased valiance and motivation. Effort leads to better performance, that performance produces a better outcome, or reward Leaders have to use in different types of leadership depending on the situation. The leader’s job is to help their employees reach their goals and to ensure that their goals are same as the organization’s. Four types of leadership behavior are addressed under this...

Loading: Checking Spelling

0%

Read more

A Managers Role and Motivation Techniques.

1770 words - 7 pages 4. Findings4.1 A manager's role the most pivotal role of any manager is performance; any business is assessed on its achievement of set targets, and it is the manager's job to ensure this. "Effective leadership is not about making speeches or being liked; leadership is defined by results not attributes" Peter F. Drucker. Key to the results of any organisation is the employees and their motivation to achieve high levels of efficiency; there are...

Motivation other than Money in the Workplace

875 words - 4 pages The Motivation of Money Many people believe that they are motivated by earning money, but this is not always completely true as there are many other factors such as the conditions of the workplace and the need to be appreciated. There are many arguments that are both for and against money being the key motivator in the workplace. Some argue that being paid a good salary is important in attracting employees to a job...

Motivation in the Workplace applying Maslow and Herzberg theories.

1506 words - 6 pages Team Motivation Paper:The motivation process behind the management team of XXXX consists of the respected theories of Abraham Maslow and Fredrick Herzberg. Using Maslow's hierarchy of needs and Herzberg's motivation-hygiene supposition, this company compounds the necessity to encourage effective productivity of its employees to...

Tasks of Managers

809 words - 3 pages Tasks of Managers The success of any organization depends on the ability of managers to provide a motivating environment for its employees. Motivated employees are more productive, happier, and stay with the organization longer. One of the primary tasks a manager faces is to find out what motivates their staff. By understanding employee needs, managers can understand what rewards to use to motivate them. Abraham Maslow proposed the theory...

Motivation

2387 words - 10 pages Motivation is one of the most discussed topics in the present era’s organisations, especially since renowned psychologists like Maslow and Herzberg are dedicating their efforts to understanding it. Companies are investing a significant amount of resources in improving productivity in order to maximise profits. One of these important resources is of human nature. In order to get the very best out of employees, some motivational approaches need to...

Examine two content theories of motivation that you are familiar with and explain how these theories might help managers motivate employees more effectively.

1696 words - 7 pages Motivation is a very important process in understanding behaviour. In an organization, the effectiveness of a manager can be determined from his leadership ability in order to achieve personal and organizational goals. In simple words, motivation is to understand the 'why' of a human behaviour. Another definition according to J Stoner, motivation is the factors that cause, channel and sustain an individual's behaviour.The Theories of...

Organizational behavior mgt331

626 words - 3 pages Motivation PaperThe first step to successfully applying the Two-Factor Theory to the administrative staff of The UOP Company is to assess the situation. The first matter of business for this team is to have a team meeting and request feedback from the staff. The two focus points of the Two-Factor Theory are job concepts that cause dissatisfaction and...

Frederick Herzberg's Motivator-Hygience Theory

1990 words - 8 pages Frederick Herzberg is renowned for the development of his Motivator-Hygiene theory. His theory stands on the ground that employees need to get satisfied with their job and avoid job dissatisfaction. For this purpose Herzberg recommends focusing on hygiene factors to avoid job dissatisfaction and focus on motivation factors to stimulate job satisfaction. In such a way, employees achieve job satisfaction and positive performance. 2010...

Theory of Motivation

910 words - 4 pages The concept of why humans do the things they do, has been studied and analyzed since the time of early Greek philosophers such as "Socrates, Plato and Aristotle" (Reeve 2001, pg.24). According to Reeve (2001), these academic pioneers proclaimed that motivation was a culmination of a tripartite consisting of the appetitive aspect on the primitive level, the competitive aspect on the second level and the calculating aspect of the human psyche on...

Motivation

889 words - 4 pages Motivation Motivation ‘’ is a process that account an individual’s intensity, direction and persistence of effort toward attaining a goal’’ (Stephen, p155). Furthermore, motivation can be a technique to encourage people so that they can perform their work more efficiently towards achievement or milestone. Whereas some people say that we can motivate employee by praising them during their work and properly understand the requirements faced by the...

Motivation Theory

1762 words - 7 pages HOW MIGHT IN-DEPTH KNOWLEDGE OF MOTIVATIONAL THEORY HELP SOMEONE BECOME A BETTER MANAGER? The word motivation comes from the Latin word "movere", which means to move. Motivation is defined as an internal drive that activates behaviours and gives it direction. The term motivation theory is concerned with the processes that describe why and how human behaviour is activated and directed. It is regarded as one of the most important...

0 Thoughts to “Essays Motivator Factors In The Two

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *